North Dakota Fighting Hawks vs Clemson Tigers prediction, odds and picks, November 9, 2026
- Projected winnerClemson 85%
- Projected scoreClemson 79, North Dakota 67
- Model spreadClemson −12.5 total 145.5
- Crowd's pickno picks yet
Bandwagon Axle 2.0 · Updated
North Dakota Fighting Hawks or Clemson Tigers: the bandwagon
Axle 15–85Market –
North Dakota Fighting Hawks at Clemson Tigers win probability
Bandwagon's modelThe in-game line starts when the game does; the dashed line is the model's pregame number.
Bandwagon's model, from the score, the clock and the pregame line; the crowd's pregame picks and the markets' latest price sit beside its end. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
How this line is computed
The home side's chance is the pregame model probability at kickoff. As the game goes on, the score margin counts for more and the pregame number for less, in proportion to the square root of the share of the game left, with a small adjustment for who has the ball in football and basketball. A lead late is close to certain; a tie late is close to even. It knows only the score, the clock and the pregame line: not injuries, foul trouble, field position or who is on the ice. Soccer counts a draw as half a win. Points are stored on every read of the league's public game summary while the game is on; a game read only after the final whistle is rebuilt from its scoring plays.
North Dakota Fighting Hawks vs Clemson Tigers live stats
From the league's public game summaryTeam statistics appear once the game starts.
North Dakota Fighting Hawks vs Clemson Tigers team breakdown
From the stored in-game series (none for this game)| Stat | UND | CLEM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | UND– | CLEM– |
| Average win probability | UND– | CLEM– |
| Longest scoring run | UND– | CLEM– |
| Time leading | UND– | CLEM– |
North Dakota Fighting Hawks vs Clemson Tigers odds
Every stored line
| Stored | CLEM win | Move |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 12:11 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 12:11 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 10:16 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 9:05 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 5:03 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 12:10 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 10:28 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:48 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:13 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:53 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 5:03 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:30 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:24 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:19 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:10 AM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:35 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:19 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:09 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:59 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:56 PM ET | 85% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:51 PM ET | 85% | +2 |
| Nov 2, 10:38 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:17 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:12 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:07 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:46 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:41 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:36 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:31 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:16 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:06 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:01 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:56 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:46 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:31 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:41 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:58 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:05 AM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:25 AM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:03 AM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 12:08 PM ET | 83% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 5:02 AM ET | 83% | −4 |
| Oct 31, 6:03 AM ET | 87% | 0 |
| Oct 30, 6:03 AM ET | 87% | 0 |
| Oct 29, 10:27 PM ET | 87% | +22 |
| Oct 29, 6:01 AM ET | 65% | — |
- Ratings
- CLEM 1609 · UND 1430
- Home spread
- −12.5
- Stored
- Nov 5, 12:11 AM ET · 2026-11-05 05:11 UTC
- Version
- Axle 2.0
Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
How this line is made
In NCAA Division I men's basketball a line starts from the ratings and adds the internal inputs marked used (rest, back-to-back, recent form) through a calibration layer fitted on past NCAA Division I men's basketball seasons, which beat rating-only out of sample. Travel and time zones did not improve the line here; injuries and weather are collected but not yet measured.
Internal
- Ratings from results usedan Elo-style rating per team from every final score, with margin of victory · Bandwagon's stored results
- Home advantage usedthe league's home edge, none at a neutral site · Bandwagon's model constants, checked against results
- Schedule usedrest days, back-to-back games and three games in four days · Bandwagon's stored fixtures
- Recent form unavailable for this game · Fewer than three games played this season by at least one sideaverage margin over each side's last games this season · Bandwagon's stored results
External
- Injuries unavailable for this game · More than three days to kickoff; lists are used inside that windowplayers listed out or doubtful, weighted by their share of the team's playing time · Public injury lists and box scores
- Travel and time zones in the data, not useddistance and time-zone change from each side's last game to the venue · Wikidata coordinates, Open-Meteo time zones · read Oct 29, 10:29 PM UTC
- Weather unavailable for this game · Indoor sportforecast wind, rain and temperature around kickoff at open-air venues · Open-Meteo forecasts
Prediction markets and the crowd's split are shown beside the model's lines for comparison. They are not inputs. Method and record.
Who ya got: bandwagon versus model
Be the first on the bandwagon
No picks yet; the model number is the win probability beside it. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
North Dakota Fighting Hawks vs Clemson Tigers prediction
Bandwagon's model makes the Tigers a 12.5-point favorite at home, with a 85% chance to win. The model total is 145.5. Ratings: Tigers 1609 (42nd of 361), Fighting Hawks 1430 (278th). The Tigers are 1-0; the Fighting Hawks are 0-1. The Tigers have won 3 of their last 5; the Fighting Hawks 2 of their last 5.
Written from the numbers on this page by a template; nothing here is an opinion.
Recent form
North Dakota Fighting Hawks
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at Minnesota Golden Gophers | L 50–85 | – | – | matchup | |
| at North Dakota State Bison | L 62–70 | – | – | matchup | |
| at St. Thomas Tommies | W 67–66 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Denver Pioneers | W 83–67 | – | – | matchup | |
| at North Dakota State Bison | L 63–96 | – | – | matchup |
Clemson Tigers
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs Stetson Hatters | W 85–72 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Iowa Hawkeyes | L 61–67 | – | – | matchup | |
| at Duke Blue Devils | L 61–73 | – | – | matchup | |
| at North Carolina Tar Heels | W 80–79 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons | W 71–62 | – | – | matchup |
Head-to-head
No earlier meeting in Bandwagon's results history.
Injuries
North Dakota Fighting Hawks: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
Clemson Tigers: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
From the roster source's status flag only; no depth chart or game-time status.
Standings and ratings
All ratings- Fighting Hawks0-1 7th · L1
- Fighting Hawks rating1430 278th of 361, 1 games
- Tigers1-0 3rd · W1
- Tigers rating1609 42nd of 361, 1 games
NCAA Division I men's basketball · 7th · streak L1
No stances yet today on $UNDMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the North Dakota Fighting Hawks bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
Clemson Tigers 1-0
NCAA Division I men's basketball · 3rd · streak W1
No stances yet today on $CLEMMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the Clemson Tigers bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
Takes on North Dakota Fighting Hawks at Clemson Tigers
Sign in to post a take on $UNDMBBCLEMMBB261110: ▲ on the bandwagon or ▼ off it, and why.
No takes on this game yet. Yours goes first.
Model: Clemson 85% to win. Projected score Clemson 79, North Dakota 67; spread Clemson −12.5, total 145.5. North Dakota Fighting Hawks at Clemson Tigers, Mon, Nov 9, 7:00 PM ET.