Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs James Madison Dukes prediction, odds and picks, November 5, 2026
- Projected winnerJames Madison 96%
- Projected scoreJames Madison 76, Central Connecticut 51
- Model spreadJames Madison −24 total 127
- Crowd's pickno picks yet
Bandwagon Axle 2.0 · Updated
Central Connecticut Blue Devils or James Madison Dukes: the bandwagon
Axle 4–96Market –
Central Connecticut Blue Devils at James Madison Dukes win probability
Bandwagon's modelThe in-game line starts when the game does; the dashed line is the model's pregame number.
Bandwagon's model, from the score, the clock and the pregame line; the crowd's pregame picks and the markets' latest price sit beside its end. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
How this line is computed
The home side's chance is the pregame model probability at kickoff. As the game goes on, the score margin counts for more and the pregame number for less, in proportion to the square root of the share of the game left, with a small adjustment for who has the ball in football and basketball. A lead late is close to certain; a tie late is close to even. It knows only the score, the clock and the pregame line: not injuries, foul trouble, field position or who is on the ice. Soccer counts a draw as half a win. Points are stored on every read of the league's public game summary while the game is on; a game read only after the final whistle is rebuilt from its scoring plays.
Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs James Madison Dukes live stats
From the league's public game summaryTeam statistics appear once the game starts.
Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs James Madison Dukes team breakdown
From the stored in-game series (none for this game)| Stat | CCSU | JMU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CCSU– | JMU– |
| Average win probability | CCSU– | JMU– |
| Longest scoring run | CCSU– | JMU– |
| Time leading | CCSU– | JMU– |
Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs James Madison Dukes odds
Every stored line
| Stored | JMU win | Move |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 8:05 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 8:05 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 7:49 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 5:03 AM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 11:06 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 10:13 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 10:03 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:58 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:38 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:28 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:23 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:08 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:03 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:58 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:53 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:43 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:03 PM ET | 96% | +1 |
| Nov 3, 1:03 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 5:03 AM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:34 AM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:05 AM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:55 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:19 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:41 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:18 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:13 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:03 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:58 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:46 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:41 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:36 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:21 PM ET | 95% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:16 PM ET | 95% | −1 |
| Nov 2, 9:12 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:01 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:56 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:51 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:26 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:11 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:01 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:56 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:51 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:46 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:16 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:12 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:06 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 6:58 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 6:47 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 6:13 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 4:58 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 4:08 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 3:02 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 2:20 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 2:05 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 1:46 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 1:16 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 1:06 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 1:01 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 12:31 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:03 AM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 2:23 PM ET | 96% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 5:02 AM ET | 96% | −2 |
| Oct 31, 6:03 AM ET | 98% | 0 |
| Oct 30, 6:03 AM ET | 98% | 0 |
| Oct 29, 10:27 PM ET | 98% | +35 |
| Oct 29, 6:01 AM ET | 63% | — |
- Ratings
- JMU 1660 · CCSU 1294
- Home spread
- −24
- Stored
- Nov 4, 8:05 PM ET · 2026-11-05 01:05 UTC
- Version
- Axle 2.0
Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
How this line is made
In NCAA Division I women's basketball a line starts from the ratings and adds the internal inputs marked used (rest, back-to-back, recent form) through a calibration layer fitted on past NCAA Division I women's basketball seasons, which beat rating-only out of sample. Travel and time zones did not improve the line here; injuries and weather are collected but not yet measured.
Internal
- Ratings from results usedan Elo-style rating per team from every final score, with margin of victory · Bandwagon's stored results
- Home advantage usedthe league's home edge, none at a neutral site · Bandwagon's model constants, checked against results
- Schedule usedrest days, back-to-back games and three games in four days · Bandwagon's stored fixtures
- Recent form unavailable for this game · Fewer than three games played this season by at least one sideaverage margin over each side's last games this season · Bandwagon's stored results
External
- Injuries unavailable for this game · No injury list read before this gameplayers listed out or doubtful, weighted by their share of the team's playing time · Public injury lists and box scores
- Travel and time zones in the data, not useddistance and time-zone change from each side's last game to the venue · Wikidata coordinates, Open-Meteo time zones · read Oct 29, 10:37 PM UTC
- Weather unavailable for this game · Indoor sportforecast wind, rain and temperature around kickoff at open-air venues · Open-Meteo forecasts
Prediction markets and the crowd's split are shown beside the model's lines for comparison. They are not inputs. Method and record.
Who ya got: bandwagon versus model
Be the first on the bandwagon
No picks yet; the model number is the win probability beside it. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs James Madison Dukes prediction
Bandwagon's model makes the Dukes a 24-point favorite at home, with a 96% chance to win. The model total is 127. Ratings: Dukes 1660 (33rd of 356), Blue Devils 1294 (347th). The Dukes are 0-1; the Blue Devils are 0-1. The Dukes have won 3 of their last 5; the Blue Devils 2 of their last 5.
Written from the numbers on this page by a template; nothing here is an opinion.
Recent form
Central Connecticut Blue Devils
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at VCU Rams | L 43–67 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs New Haven Chargers | W 60–50 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Chicago State Cougars | W 86–75 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Fairleigh Dickinson Knights | L 36–77 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Wagner Seahawks | L 41–50 | – | – | matchup |
James Madison Dukes
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at Miami (OH) RedHawks | L 52–59 | – | – | matchup | |
| at Kentucky Wildcats | L 56–71 | – | – | matchup | |
| at Troy Trojans | W 69–52 | – | – | matchup | |
| at Georgia Southern Eagles | W 81–53 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs South Alabama Jaguars | W 79–54 | – | – | matchup |
Head-to-head
No earlier meeting in Bandwagon's results history.
Injuries
Central Connecticut Blue Devils: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
James Madison Dukes: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
From the roster source's status flag only; no depth chart or game-time status.
Standings and ratings
All ratings- Blue Devils0-1 3rd · L1
- Blue Devils rating1294 347th of 356, 1 games
- Dukes0-1 13th · L1
- Dukes rating1660 33rd of 356, 1 games
NCAA Division I women's basketball · 3rd · streak L1
No stances yet today on $CCSUWBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the Central Connecticut Blue Devils bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
NCAA Division I women's basketball · 13th · streak L1
No stances yet today on $JMUWBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the James Madison Dukes bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
Takes on Central Connecticut Blue Devils at James Madison Dukes
Sign in to post a take on $CCSUWBBJMUWBB261105: ▲ on the bandwagon or ▼ off it, and why.
No takes on this game yet. Yours goes first.
Model: James Madison 96% to win. Projected score James Madison 76, Central Connecticut 51; spread James Madison −24, total 127. Central Connecticut Blue Devils at James Madison Dukes, Thu, Nov 5, 6:00 PM ET.