California Golden Bears vs Houston Cougars: final score and how the prediction did, November 8, 2026
California at Houston: Bandwagon's model made Houston a 75% favorite (Houston −8.5); the DraftKings closing line was Houston −19.5 with a total of 143.5, as of Nov 8, 8:27 p.m. ET.
- Final scoreCalifornia 68, Houston 86 the projected winner won
- Pregame Projected winnerHouston 75%
- Pregame Projected scoreHouston 77, California 69
- Model spreadHouston −8.5 total 146.5
- Margin18 projected 8.4
- Total154 projected 146.5
Bandwagon Axle 2.0 · Updated
California Golden Bears or Houston Cougars: the bandwagon
Axle pregame 25–75Market 4–96
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAL | 32 | 36 | 68 |
| HOU | 43 | 43 | 86 |
California Golden Bears at Houston Cougars win probability
Bandwagon's modelBandwagon's model, from the score, the clock and the pregame line; the crowd's pregame picks and the markets' latest price sit beside its end. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
How this line is computed
The home side's chance is the pregame model probability at kickoff. As the game goes on, the score margin counts for more and the pregame number for less, in proportion to the square root of the share of the game left, with a small adjustment for who has the ball in football and basketball. A lead late is close to certain; a tie late is close to even. It knows only the score, the clock and the pregame line: not injuries, foul trouble, field position or who is on the ice. Soccer counts a draw as half a win. Points are stored on every read of the league's public game summary while the game is on; a game read only after the final whistle is rebuilt from its scoring plays.
California Golden Bears vs Houston Cougars live stats
Team totals read from the league's public game summary| Stat | CAL | HOU |
|---|---|---|
| Field goals | CAL25/57 | HOU35/67 |
| 3-pointers | CAL9/26 | HOU6/16 |
| Free throws | CAL9/14 | HOU10/11 |
| Rebounds | CAL31 | HOU35 |
| Assists | CAL15 | HOU18 |
| Turnovers | CAL16 | HOU9 |
| Steals | CAL6 | HOU14 |
| Blocks | CAL1 | HOU7 |
| Points in the paint | CAL24 | HOU50 |
| Fast-break points | CAL8 | HOU20 |
| Fouls | CAL15 | HOU14 |
| Largest lead | CAL0 | HOU23 |
California Golden Bears vs Houston Cougars team breakdown
From the stored in-game series| Stat | CAL | HOU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | CAL68 | HOU86 |
| Average win probability | CAL5% | HOU95% |
| Longest scoring run | CAL+7 | HOU+9 |
| Time leading | CAL0:00 | HOU35:53 |
California Golden Bears vs Houston Cougars model odds
Every stored line
| Stored | HOU win | Move |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 10:28 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 10:28 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 8:23 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 7:58 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 7:14 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 6:53 PM ET | 75% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 6:33 PM ET | 75% | +45 |
| Nov 8, 5:58 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 4:18 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 4:13 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 4:09 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 4:03 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 3:18 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 2:03 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 8, 5:04 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 11:52 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 11:06 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 10:27 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 10:22 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 10:20 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 10:05 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 9:45 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 9:26 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 9:04 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 8:59 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 8:04 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 7:04 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 6:40 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 6:10 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 5:54 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 5:39 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 5:24 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 5:09 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 4:49 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 4:29 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 4:14 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 2:29 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 5:02 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 7, 12:49 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 11:44 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 11:34 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 11:24 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 11:14 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 10:59 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 10:40 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 10:35 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 10:20 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:51 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:36 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:31 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:26 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:22 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 9:06 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 8:56 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 7:12 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 6:09 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 5:03 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 6, 12:54 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 11:16 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 10:57 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 10:27 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 10:08 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:48 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:43 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:33 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:28 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:18 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 9:13 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 8:58 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 8:08 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 7:33 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 5:04 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 5, 12:11 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 11:01 PM ET | 30% | +1 |
| Nov 4, 10:16 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 9:40 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 9:05 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 5:03 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 12:20 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 4, 12:10 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 10:23 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 10:03 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:33 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:23 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:18 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 9:03 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 8:03 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 5:03 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:39 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:30 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 3, 12:19 AM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:40 PM ET | 29% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:35 PM ET | 29% | −1 |
| Nov 2, 11:19 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 11:09 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:59 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:56 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:38 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:27 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:12 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 10:03 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:57 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:46 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:41 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:36 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:31 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:16 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:12 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:06 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 9:01 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:56 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:46 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:41 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:21 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:16 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 7:41 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 4:48 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 1:55 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 8:05 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:25 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 5:03 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 2, 2:05 AM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 12:08 PM ET | 30% | 0 |
| Nov 1, 5:02 AM ET | 30% | +12 |
| Oct 31, 6:03 AM ET | 18% | 0 |
| Oct 30, 6:03 AM ET | 18% | 0 |
| Oct 29, 10:27 PM ET | 18% | −32 |
| Oct 29, 6:01 AM ET | 50% | — |
- Ratings
- HOU 1703 · CAL 1540
- Home spread
- −8.5 · neutral site, no home advantage
- Stored
- Nov 8, 10:28 PM ET · 2026-11-09 03:28 UTC
- Version
- Axle 2.0
Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
Result: California Golden Bears 68, Houston Cougars 86. The closing line above is the last one the model stored before kickoff.
How this line is made
In NCAA Division I men's basketball a line starts from the ratings and adds the internal inputs marked used (rest, back-to-back, recent form) through a calibration layer fitted on past NCAA Division I men's basketball seasons, which beat rating-only out of sample. Travel and time zones did not improve the line here; injuries and weather are collected but not yet measured.
Internal
- Ratings from results usedan Elo-style rating per team from every final score, with margin of victory · Bandwagon's stored results
- Home advantage used · none: neutral sitethe league's home edge, none at a neutral site · Bandwagon's model constants, checked against results
- Schedule usedrest days, back-to-back games and three games in four days · Bandwagon's stored fixtures
- Recent form unavailable for this game · Fewer than three games played this season by at least one sideaverage margin over each side's last games this season · Bandwagon's stored results
External
- Injuries unavailable for this game · No injury list read before this gameplayers listed out or doubtful, weighted by their share of the team's playing time · Public injury lists and box scores
- Travel and time zones unavailable for this game · Neutral sitedistance and time-zone change from each side's last game to the venue · Wikidata venue coordinates, Open-Meteo time zones
- Weather unavailable for this game · Indoor sportforecast wind, rain and temperature around kickoff at open-air venues · Open-Meteo forecasts
Prediction markets and the crowd's split are shown beside the model's lines for comparison. They are not inputs. Method and record.
Who ya got: bandwagon versus model
Be the first on the bandwagon
No picks yet; the model number is the win probability beside it. Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.
DraftKings line, closing
| Axle | DraftKings line (closing) | |
|---|---|---|
| Spread | Houston −8.5 | Houston −19.5 |
| Total | 146.5 | 143.5 |
| Moneyline (away / home) | +296 / −296 | +1400 / −3200 |
DraftKings line: the spread, total and moneylines DraftKings published for this game, the last complete ones read before the game started, as read from a public league scoreboard feed, as of ; these figures have stood since . Shown for comparison; Axle never reads them (how the comparison works).
California vs Houston odds on Kalshi and Polymarket
Every Men's college basketball marketKalshi had Cougars at 96% when last read, ; Polymarket had them at 96% when last read, ; and Axle 2.0 had them at 75% when last read, .
| Source | CAL | HOU | Price read | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalshi | 4% | 96% | · closing price | |
| Polymarket | 4% | 96% | · closing price | |
| Bandwagon model | 25% | 75% | · model 2.0 |
Ad · Bandwagon earns a commission: Trade on Kalshi (opens a new tab). 18+. Trading carries a risk of loss. Check your state. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Market prices from Kalshi and Polymarket, shown for analysis. Bandwagon does not take or place wagers. How this works
California Golden Bears vs Houston Cougars prediction
Bandwagon's model makes the Cougars a 8.5-point favorite, with a 75% chance to win. The model total is 146.5. Ratings: Cougars 1716 (6th of 365), Golden Bears 1528 (136th). The Cougars are 2-0; the Golden Bears are 2-1. The Cougars have won 3 of their last 5; the Golden Bears 3 of their last 5.
Written from the numbers on this page by a template; nothing here is an opinion.
Recent form
California Golden Bears
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs California Golden Bears | W 86–68 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Radford Highlanders | W 84–70 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Saint Joseph's Hawks | L 75–76 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs UIC Flames | W 91–73 | – | – | matchup | |
| at Florida State Seminoles | L 89–95 | – | – | matchup |
Houston Cougars
| Opponent | Kick (ET) | Result | Picks | Axle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at Houston Cougars | L 68–86 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs La Salle Explorers | W 94–55 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Illinois Fighting Illini | L 55–65 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Texas A&M Aggies | W 88–57 | – | – | matchup | |
| vs Idaho Vandals | W 78–47 | – | – | matchup |
Head-to-head
No earlier meeting in Bandwagon's results history.
Injuries
California Golden Bears: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
Houston Cougars: nobody listed as injured by the roster source
From the roster source's status flag only; no depth chart or game-time status.
Standings and ratings
All ratings- Golden Bears2-1 13th · L1
- Golden Bears rating1528 136th of 365, 2 games
- Cougars2-0 9th · W2
- Cougars rating1716 6th of 365, 2 games
NCAA Division I men's basketball · 13th · streak L1
No stances yet today on $CALMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the California Golden Bears bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
Houston Cougars 2-0
NCAA Division I men's basketball · 9th · streak W2
No stances yet today on $HOUMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the Houston Cougars bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.
Takes on California Golden Bears at Houston Cougars
Sign in to post a take on $HOUMBBCALMBB261109: ▲ on the bandwagon or ▼ off it, and why.
No takes on this game yet. Yours goes first.
Final: California 68, Houston 86. Bandwagon's model had the Houston at 75% and projected Houston 77, California 69; spread Houston −8.5, total 146.5. Last read: Kalshi 96%, Polymarket 96% for Houston.