CBBFDU–ETAM11:30 AMCBBKC–FAMU12:00 PMWCBBUIW–UTSA12:00 PMWCBBHCU–UNT12:00 PMCBBDART–UALB1:00 PMWCBBBCU–BYU1:00 PMWCBBUSA–FAU1:00 PMCBBUIW–UCD2:00 PMWCBBQUIN–SJU2:00 PMCBBJOES–USF3:00 PMCBBLUC–AF3:00 PMCBBNCAT–ECU4:00 PMWCBBORE–UVM4:00 PMWCBBMERC–SBU4:30 PMCBBBCU–SDSU5:00 PMWCBBEIU–SLU5:00 PMCBBPENN–NAVY5:30 PMWCBBNAVY–JMU6:00 PMWCBBGMU–ARMY6:00 PMWCBBJAX–CCU6:00 PMWCBBUNCG–GWEB6:00 PMWCBBBING–COLG6:00 PMWCBBRAD–CAM6:00 PMWCBBFOR–BUCK6:00 PMWCBBGTWN–GW6:00 PMWCBBUWF–FSU6:00 PMWCBBNJIT–LAF6:00 PMCBBNCCU–VMI6:00 PMWCBBEMU–RMU6:00 PMWCBBSIE–SYR6:00 PMWCBBSF–AF6:00 PMWCBBMSM–LEH6:00 PMWCBBDREX–UVA6:00 PMWCBBMRST–DUQ6:00 PMWCBBSTBK–NIA6:00 PMWCBBCOPP–HOF6:00 PMWCBBIDST–USU6:00 PMWCBBUML–BC6:00 PMWCBBEVAN–UK6:30 PMWCBBAPSU–UCF6:30 PMAll scores
bandwagon.Newsletter
Axle 2.076% straight up1147 games
NCAA Men's Basketball · · Alex G. Spanos Center · every NCAA Division I men's basketball line

Air Force Falcons vs Pacific Tigers prediction, odds and picks, November 14, 2026

Air Force at Pacific: Bandwagon's model makes Pacific an 86% favorite (Pacific −13).

Air Force Falcons vs Pacific Tigers odds and win probability

AF · AWAYAir Force2-1 · won 1 of last 5
Tip-offAlex G. Spanos Center
PAC · HOMEPacific2-0 · won 2 of last 5

Axle gives Pacific a 86% chance to win, by about 13 points.

Air Force 14%Pacific 86%
Projected score66–79Air Force–Pacific
Model spreadPAC −13AF +13
Model total145points
Model moneyline+597 / −597AF / PAC

Bandwagon Axle 2.0 · Updated

Bandwagon's model, not a sportsbook line. We do not take wagers.

Who ya got · no picks yet

Hop on a side before tip-off

Pick a side, then say why in a take. Change it any time before tip-off. Counts in the weekly pick'em.

Why Axle has Pacific

All CBB ratings
AF and PAC side by side
AFPAC
Rating1324 358th of 3651513 156th of 365
Record2-12-0
Last 5 games1-42-3
StreakW2W2
Home fieldNoYes
Meetings won01

Blue marks the better side of each row. This line uses ratings from results, home advantage and schedule; record, last 5 results, streak and meetings are context only, not inputs.

How Axle's line has moved

Line movementPAC win chance, 122 stored lines
+2 pts for PAC since Nov 1
92%78%
Nov 1, 5:02 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 1, 12:08 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 5:25 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 5:58 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 8:41 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 9:01 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 9:12 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 9:36 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 10:07 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 10:38 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 11:04 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 2, 11:40 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 3, 12:30 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 3, 8:03 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 3, 9:48 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 4, 12:10 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 4, 5:03 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 4, 11:51 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 5, 7:33 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 5, 8:58 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 5, 9:33 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 5, 10:57 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 5:03 AM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 9:01 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 9:51 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 10:40 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 11:04 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 6, 11:44 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 7, 2:29 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 7, 4:49 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 7, 5:39 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 7, 8:04 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 7, 9:45 PM ET: PAC 84%Nov 8, 5:04 AM ET: PAC 87%Nov 8, 2:03 PM ET: PAC 87%Nov 8, 4:09 PM ET: PAC 87%Nov 8, 4:18 PM ET: PAC 87%Nov 8, 7:58 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 9, 8:58 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 9, 9:08 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 9, 9:34 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 9, 11:37 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 8:28 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 9:03 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 9:18 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 10:08 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 10:58 PM ET: PAC 86%Nov 10, 11:48 PM ET: PAC 86%
Nov 1Nov 6Now
Every stored line
StoredPAC winMove
Nov 10, 11:48 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 11:48 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 11:03 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 10:58 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 10:38 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 10:08 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:58 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:43 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:18 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:13 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:08 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 9:03 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 8:58 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 8:28 PM ET86%0
Nov 10, 5:03 AM ET86%0
Nov 10, 2:17 AM ET86%0
Nov 9, 11:37 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 11:23 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 10:18 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 9:34 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 9:28 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 9:13 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 9:08 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 9:03 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 8:58 PM ET86%0
Nov 9, 5:04 AM ET86%0
Nov 8, 9:03 PM ET86%0
Nov 8, 7:58 PM ET86%0
Nov 8, 6:53 PM ET86%0
Nov 8, 5:28 PM ET86%−1
Nov 8, 4:18 PM ET87%0
Nov 8, 4:13 PM ET87%0
Nov 8, 4:09 PM ET87%0
Nov 8, 4:03 PM ET87%0
Nov 8, 2:03 PM ET87%0
Nov 8, 5:04 AM ET87%0
Nov 7, 11:52 PM ET87%0
Nov 7, 10:05 PM ET87%+3
Nov 7, 9:45 PM ET84%−1
Nov 7, 9:04 PM ET85%+1
Nov 7, 8:04 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 7:04 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 5:54 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 5:39 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 5:29 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 5:24 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 4:49 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 3:15 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 2:29 PM ET84%0
Nov 7, 5:02 AM ET84%0
Nov 7, 12:49 AM ET84%0
Nov 6, 11:44 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 11:34 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 11:09 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 11:04 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 10:44 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 10:40 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 10:35 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 10:07 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 9:51 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 9:31 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 9:06 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 9:01 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 7:12 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 6:09 PM ET84%0
Nov 6, 5:03 AM ET84%0
Nov 6, 12:54 AM ET84%0
Nov 5, 10:57 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 10:17 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 10:08 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 9:33 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 9:28 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 9:13 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 8:58 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 8:08 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 7:33 PM ET84%0
Nov 5, 5:04 AM ET84%0
Nov 5, 12:11 AM ET84%0
Nov 4, 11:51 PM ET84%0
Nov 4, 9:40 PM ET84%0
Nov 4, 9:25 PM ET84%0
Nov 4, 5:03 AM ET84%0
Nov 4, 12:25 AM ET84%0
Nov 4, 12:10 AM ET84%0
Nov 3, 10:28 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 10:23 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 9:48 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 9:33 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 9:08 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 8:03 PM ET84%0
Nov 3, 5:03 AM ET84%0
Nov 3, 12:30 AM ET84%0
Nov 3, 12:19 AM ET84%0
Nov 3, 12:05 AM ET84%0
Nov 2, 11:40 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 11:35 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 11:19 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 11:04 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 10:56 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 10:38 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 10:27 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 10:12 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 10:07 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:57 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:41 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:36 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:31 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:16 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:12 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:06 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 9:01 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 8:56 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 8:46 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 8:41 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 8:21 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 7:41 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 5:58 PM ET84%0
Nov 2, 8:05 AM ET84%0
Nov 2, 5:25 AM ET84%0
Nov 2, 5:03 AM ET84%0
Nov 1, 12:08 PM ET84%0
Nov 1, 5:02 AM ET84%—

Air Force Falcons vs Pacific Tigers prediction

Bandwagon's model makes the Tigers a 13-point favorite at home, with a 86% chance to win. The model total is 145. Ratings: Tigers 1513 (156th of 365), Falcons 1324 (358th). The Tigers are 2-0; the Falcons are 2-1. The Tigers have won 2 of their last 5; the Falcons 1 of their last 5. The two have met 1 time in Bandwagon's results history; the Tigers won 1, the Falcons 0.

Written from the numbers on this page by a template; nothing here is an opinion.

Form, head-to-head and injuries

Recent form

Air Force Falcons

OpponentKick (ET)ResultPicksAxle
vs Idaho State BengalsW 89–82––matchup
at Wright State RaidersL 71–102––matchup
at Nevada Wolf PackL 45–80––matchup
at Nevada Wolf PackL 59–74––matchup
vs Grand Canyon LopesL 60–86––matchup

Pacific Tigers

OpponentKick (ET)ResultPicksAxle
at Bradley BravesW 63–52––matchup
at Santa Clara BroncosL 68–76––matchup
vs Seattle U RedhawksW 61–58––matchup
vs San Francisco DonsL 61–72––matchup
at Gonzaga BulldogsL 62–71––matchup

Head-to-head

GameKick (ET)ResultPicksAxle
Pacific Tigers at Air Force Falcons80–65––matchup

Injuries

Air Force Falcons: nobody listed as injured by the roster source

Pacific Tigers: nobody listed as injured by the roster source

From the roster source's status flag only; no depth chart or game-time status.

Standings and ratings

All ratings
  • Falcons2-1 6th · W2
  • Falcons rating1324 358th of 365, 2 games
  • Tigers2-0 3rd · W2
  • Tigers rating1513 156th of 365, 1 games

More CBB games in the next 7 days

The bandwagon on each team

Air Force Falcons 2-1

NCAA Division I men's basketball · 6th · streak W2

–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo stances yet today on $AFMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –
–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo fan stances yet today on $AFMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –
–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo neutral stances yet today on $AFMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –

No stances yet today on $AFMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the Air Force Falcons bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.

Falcons roster, schedule and more

Pacific Tigers 2-0

NCAA Division I men's basketball · 3rd · streak W2

–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo stances yet today on $PACMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –
–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo fan stances yet today on $PACMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –
–
Be the first on the bandwagonNo neutral stances yet today on $PACMBB
▲ on –30 days: not enough history▼ off –

No stances yet today on $PACMBB: the share of the crowd ▲ on the Pacific Tigers bandwagon, fans and neutrals counted apart.

Tigers roster, schedule and more

Takes on Air Force Falcons at Pacific Tigers

Sign in to post a take on $AFMBBPACMBB261114: ▲ on the bandwagon or ▼ off it, and why.

No takes on this game yet. Yours goes first.

How Axle makes this line

How this line is made

In NCAA Division I men's basketball a line starts from the ratings and adds the internal inputs marked used (rest, back-to-back, recent form) through a calibration layer fitted on past NCAA Division I men's basketball seasons, which beat rating-only out of sample. Travel and time zones did not improve the line here; injuries and weather are collected but not yet measured.

Internal

  • Ratings from results usedan Elo-style rating per team from every final score, with margin of victory · Bandwagon's stored results
  • Home advantage usedthe league's home edge, none at a neutral site · Bandwagon's model constants, checked against results
  • Schedule usedrest days, back-to-back games and three games in four days · Bandwagon's stored fixtures
  • Recent form unavailable for this game · Fewer than three games played this season by at least one sideaverage margin over each side's last games this season · Bandwagon's stored results

External

  • Injuries unavailable for this game · More than three days to kickoff; lists are used inside that windowplayers listed out or doubtful, weighted by their share of the team's playing time · Public injury lists and box scores
  • Travel and time zones in the data, not useddistance and time-zone change from each side's last game to the venue · Wikidata coordinates, Open-Meteo time zones · read Oct 29, 10:29 PM UTC
  • Weather unavailable for this game · Indoor sportforecast wind, rain and temperature around kickoff at open-air venues · Open-Meteo forecasts

Prediction markets and the crowd's split are shown beside the model's lines for comparison. They are not inputs. Method and record.

Model: Pacific 86% to win. Projected score Pacific 79, Air Force 66; spread Pacific −13, total 145. Air Force Falcons at Pacific Tigers, Sat, Nov 14, 4:00 PM ET.